Research in Focus: Telerehabilitation is Non-inferior to Usual Care Following Total Hip Replacement
June 3, 2020
Leanne Loranger, PT
Citation: Nelson M, Bourke M, Crossley K, Russell T. Telerehabilitation is Non-inferior to Usual Care Following Total Hip Replacement – A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. Physiotherapy 2020; 107:19-27
Total hip replacement (THR) is a common orthopedic surgery, with more than 6,014 THRs completed in Alberta in 2016-17 (the last year for which data is available).1 Standard post-operative care includes physiotherapy, however the optimal post-discharge rehabilitation is unknown, with a wide range of treatment interventions and timing to commence post-operative intervention reported in published research.2
Post-discharge physiotherapy care for THR patients can be impaired due to challenges related to access to care, including transportation-related barriers to care. In Australia, where the current study was conducted, prior research has demonstrated the efficacy of telerehabilitation following total knee replacement (TKR) and its utility to address access issues.
This study aimed to determine if a telerehabilitation model of post-discharge THR care was non-inferior to in-person rehabilitation.
Single center, randomized, single-blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial
Patient Inclusion Criteria
Undergoing primary elective THR
Able to attend five in-person appointments
Able to provide signed informed consent
Patient Exclusion Criteria
Comorbidities that prevent participation in rehabilitation
Intraoperative complications preventing participation in THR clinical pathway
Unable to mobilize full weight-bearing
Intervention Group – Telerehabilitation (n=35; one participant withdrew after allocation)
Standardized home exercise program (HEP)
Delivered using two apps – Wellpepper and eHAB
Wellpepper – exercise program delivery, three automated exercise reminders per day, monitored HEP compliance, and messaging feature
eHAB – real-time videoconferencing
Participants received 15 minutes of training in the use of the apps prior to discharge from hospital
One eHAB visit completed at two-weeks post discharge to review gait and provide HEP advice
Second eHAB visit at four-weeks post discharge if gait deficits noted at two-week appointment
Control Group (n=35; none lost to follow-up)
Standardized HEP (same content as intervention group)
Exercise diary to document compliance with HEP
Patients to perform exercises three times a day
30-minute in-person physiotherapy sessions at two, four and six-weeks post-op, focusing on gait and progressing HEP
Quality of Life subscale of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at six weeks
Functional health and wellbeing: Short Form – 12
Health-related quality of life: EuroQol 5-Dimension 5 Level questionnaire
System Usability Scale – to assess usability of the apps and technology
Exercise compliance – collected via Wellpepper app or exercise diary
70 participants enrolled in the study; 69 received the allocated intervention
HOOS - No between group differences in mean change from baseline to 6-weeks
SF-12 AND EQ-5D showed no between group differences
TUG, step test and muscle strength showed no between group differences
Satisfaction was high for both groups
“Only between group difference was for the item ‘my therapy session was easy to attend’ in which the intervention group scored higher”
Intervention group was also more complaint with their HEP
Both Wellpepper and eHAB scored highly on the System Usability Scale
“Remotely delivered telerehabilitation for post-operative THR is non-inferior to in-person rehabilitation… at six weeks post-op.”
Despite randomization, the intervention group mean age was younger, which may impact rate of recovery and attitude towards the intervention.
Age was included as a covariate in all analyses to control for this effect.
One physiotherapist delivered all telerehabilitation sessions, while control group participants were seen by a group of several physiotherapists, potentially impacting upon the patient-Physiotherapist relationship and patient satisfaction.
This may have impacted on the accuracy of the findings by artificially reducing control group participation and satisfaction relative to the intervention group.
Wellpepper automatically monitored exercise program compliance, whereas the control group self-reported exercise compliance, which may have impacted accuracy of compliance reported by each group.
However, improved accuracy of HEP compliance by the control group would not alter the outcomes related to the HOOS, strength, TUG, step test, SF-12 AND EQ-5D and the study’s overall finding that telerehabilitation delivered services are non-inferior to in-person care for post-operative THR patients.
Relevance to physiotherapy practice in Alberta
In the context of rapid adoption of telerehabilitation to meet patient care needs during the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these services as compared to ‘usual’ or ‘in-person’ services is crucial.
The purpose of this summary is to highlight recently published research findings that are not openly accessible. Every effort is made to ensure accuracy and clarity of the summary. Readers are encouraged to review the published article in full for further information.
Nelson M, Bourke M, Crossley K, Russell T. Telerehabilitation is Non-inferior to Usual Care Following Total Hip Replacement – A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. Physiotherapy 2002; 107:19-27
Patient Safety. Every Person. Every Time.
Regulating Alberta's physiotherapy profession and acting as an association by providing member services.